|
FORAGE
YIELD POTENTIAL
The table
below shows the performance of GRANDSTAND
relative to commercial checks in the first
and second production years. Forage yield
potential is presented as the percentage of
the check mean. The Grand Mean figure is the
average percent of checks over all
locations.
|
VARIETY |
011A6 |
011N6 |
011D1 |
02MN1 |
02lD1 |
02Wi3 |
Grand Mean |
|
GRANDSTAND |
110 |
108 |
116 |
112 |
109 |
113 |
111 |
|
Ameristand403 |
97 |
96 |
|
103 |
|
94 |
97 |
|
DKA42-15 |
|
|
105 |
|
102 |
|
130 |
|
Masterpiece |
|
|
102 |
|
95 |
|
98 |
|
Legendairy YPQ |
|
103 |
|
|
|
|
103 |
|
Magnum V |
98 |
101 |
99 |
|
97 |
|
99 |
|
Mariner |
|
|
|
|
93 |
|
93 |
|
Pioneer 54V54 |
101 |
99 |
98 |
90 |
103 |
100 |
98 |
|
Rocket |
|
102 |
|
|
|
|
102 |
|
WL327 |
|
|
103 |
|
104 |
103 |
103 |
|
WL325 HQ |
|
|
|
99 |
|
101 |
100 |
Trial Locations::
01'Boone, IA (011A6) 01'Buck Creek, IN
(011N6) 01'Nampa, ID (011D1) 02' Faribault,
MN (02MN1) 02' West Salem (02W13) 02'
Aberdeen, ID (02ID1) 02' Seward,NE(02Ne1)
PEST
RESISTANCE
|
BW |
FW |
VW |
AN |
PRR |
SN |
PA |
SAA |
PLH |
|
HR |
HR |
HR |
HR |
HR |
R |
R |
R |
S |
Multiple pest
resistance is an important feature of modem
alfalfa varieties. This variety has been
characterized for resistance to several
important alfalfa pests. Pests can cause
reduced forage yield, persistence and/or
forage quality. Bacterial wilt, Fusarium
wilt, Verticillium wilt, anthracnose, and
Phytophthora root rot are the five diseases
most commonly associated with alfalfa stand
loss in the U.S. Pea aphids are occasional
pests in most parts of North America and the
potato leafhopper can be a very serious pest
in the eastern half of the U.S. The stem
nematode and spotted alfalfa aphid can limit
yield and persistence in parts of the
Western U.S. The University of Wisconsin has
developed a disease resistance index (DRI)
to measure combined resistance to the six
major diseases. The highest possible score
in this system is 30; this variety has a DRI
of 30.
FORAGE
QUALITY
The table
below summarizes data and compares relative
forage quality of GRANDSTAND with several
commercial checks
|
VARIETY |
NDF |
NDFD |
RFQ |
|
GRANDSTAND |
38.0 |
51.6 |
174.0 |
|
WL327 |
38.3 |
50.4 |
171.0 |
|
54V54 |
39.1 |
49.3 |
164.0 |
|
Ameristand 403T |
40.4 |
48.4 |
156.0 |
|
Magnum V |
40.9 |
47.8 |
153.0 |
Forage
Genetics is using NIR predictions of Neutral
Detergent Fiber (NDF) and Neutral Detergent
Fiber Digestibility (NDFD) to estimate
forage intake potential and digestibility.
Forage Genetics is a member of the
University of Minnesota, University of
Wisconsin NIRS Consortium, and uses the
prediction equations developed exclusively
for Consortium members. Relative Forage
Quality (RFQ) is an index used to compare
forage quality of different feedstuffs and
is based on forage energy content and
digestible fiber. NDF and NDFD are used in
calculating the TDN (Total Digestible
Nutrients) component to estimate RFQ. Forage
quality was measured in yield trial plots at
three locations in 2003 to generate forage
quality comparisons between varieties.
Forage quality samples were taken and
analyzed in the first production year from
the first, second and third cuttings.
FALL DORMANCY
AND WINTERHARDINESS
The table
below summarizes ratings for fall dormancy,
winterhardiness and recovery after cutting
of GRANDSTAND compared with standard and
commercial checks. Fall dormancy,
winterhardiness and persistence ratings are
the mean of two trials (West Salem and
Boone, IA).
|
VARIETY |
FD |
WH |
PI |
Rgw |
|
GRANDSTAND |
3.9 |
1.8 |
8.3 |
8.8 |
|
Dart |
3.3 |
3.1 |
6 |
|
|
53Q60 |
3.2 |
3.1 |
8.1 |
8.2 |
|
G2852 |
3.9 |
4.1 |
4 |
|
|
Avalanche +Z |
2.3 |
2.4 |
5.6 |
6.9 |
|
Archer |
4.8 |
4.7 |
5.1 |
7.4 |
|
Vernal |
1.9 |
2.1 |
5.8 |
|
Fall dormancy
and winterhardiness ratings help determine
where a variety is best adapted. Later fall
dormant types are, in general, better suited
to take advantage of the longer growing
season typical of some production areas.
Winterhardy types are recommended in areas
where winter injury is common. In older
varieties winterhardiness was closely
related to early fall dormancy and slower
recovery after cutting. These relationships
make it difficult to combine high yield
potential and good winterhardiness. This
variety is the product of a selection
program designed to change the fall
dormancy/winterhardiness relationship. The
result is a new generation of products that
combines later fall dormancy, excellent
winterhardiness, fast recovery after cutting
and excellent forage yield potential.
Standard
tests are used to measure fall dormancy and
winterhardiness in a WH nursery in the first
and second years, respectively. A
persistence index is measured in the third
year. Recovery after cutting was rated
visually ten days after a July cutting in
West Salem. Wl variety trials.
Fall
dormancy is rated (1-9 ) with 1=earliest
dormant and 9=non-dormant.
Winterhardiness is rated (1-6 ) with
1=most hardy and 6=non-hardy.
The persistence index is rated (1-9 )
with 9=most persistent.
Recovery after cutting is rated (1-9 )
with 9=fastest regrowth.
MILK
PRODUCTION
The Agronomy
and Dairy Science Departments at the
University of Wisconsin have developed a
series of equations to predict milk
production per acre from forage. The table
below compares total milk production per
acre for GRANDSTAND with several competitive
check varieties in trials averaged over two
locations (Wisconsin and Iowa).
|
VARIETY |
2003 Yield |
Mean |
2003 |
| |
T/A |
RFQ |
Lbs Milk/Acre |
|
GRANDSTAND |
8.12 |
174 |
25,359 |
|
WL327 |
7.64 |
171 |
23,475 |
|
54V54 |
7.76 |
164 |
23,342 |
|
Ameristand 403T |
7.3 |
156 |
21,412 |
|
Magnum V |
7.33 |
153 |
21,233 |
MULTIFOLIATE EXPRESSION VARIETY
|
VARIETY |
%ML |
|
GRANDSTAND |
78 |
|
Proof (high check) |
80 |
|
MultiKing (mod check) |
41 |
|
Vernal (trifoliate check) |
0 |
GRANDSTAND
has high expression of multifoliate (ML)
trait. ML expression is a component in
improved forage quality. ML expression has
been successfully used to help market
improved forage quality. The striking visual
image of the ML trait and the
straightforward tie-in between improved
leafiness and improved forage quality. |